The position of Australian Cricket Captain
is often said to be the second most important office in the land, behind only
the position of Prime Minister. Personally I think this is over stating its
importance to Australian life…for both positions.
For many years it could have been argued
that the cricket captain had a greater influence over public confidence,
winning or losing the captain set the tone. From Allan Border “Captain Grumpy”
who was a personal career was successful despite playing with an often less
than competitive team. He taught the team how to fight and eventually to win.
Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh added their own flair to the position and built on
its winning ways to make it one of the most successful sporting teams in
international history.
During the same period Australian politics
enjoyed the leadership Bob Hawke and John Howard, two of the longest serving
Prime Ministers to lead the country. Both are known for building the country’s
prosperity. On different sides of politics, they achieved the country’s wealth
in different ways. Lets not forget Paul Keating famed for his suits and biting
repartee, he embodied the countries wealth.
Ricking Ponting despite his own personal
success, as captain reintroduced the notion of losing to the national team.
Politically Kevin Rudd took office. Like his sporting counterpart his form
after taking office started to slump until he was forced to voluntarily step
aside.
We now have Michael Clarke and Julia
Gillard. Both of them highly capable in their own rights. Both of them
suffering in the realm of leadership. Both of their teams are in a tail spin,
the more they spin the more they lose and the more public ridicule they
receive.
In the past week the cricket team, in the
middle of a lengthening losing streak, chose to suspend four players. Three of
these suspended players were potentially the most likely to contribute to an
Australian victory. Australia lost the test match.
At the same time as following the sports
team’s example Australia’s governing party suspended logic calling for a
leadership spill despite the absence of anyone else wanting to be leader. Let’s
be honest who would want to lead the
national Labor party at the moment?
When Michael Clarke injured his back the
only alternative for captain was Shane Watson – one of the players previously
suspended for not abiding to team rules. He was also quite vocal about his
dislike of the direction of Cricket Australia’s direction or personnel.
Whilst the parallels between Watson and
Rudd are alarming, Rudd at least had the dignity to not accept the offer to
lead.
Unfortunately for the Australian public we
do not have any viable or palatable alternatives for either leadership
position. Watson, Warner, Rudd, Abbott none of their personal form nor their recent
public comments warrants their being elevated to such an honour. At the same
time Clarke and Gillard have nothing to deserve their maintaining the role.
Maybe it is just time complete change,
maybe Australian football codes can offer examples of decency and leadership
that our political parties can follow.
Oh wait…
No comments:
Post a Comment