source: flickriver.com |
Nestle Allen’s confectionery has the audacity to revise its
products range and reduce the variety of shapes from which the public can
choose to consume copious amounts of sugar and food colour. Australia is
collectively outraged.
This, on the back of Allen’s reducing package and product sizes.
Killer Pythons were reduced by almost half in late 2014, making them less
python and more garden worm.
Based on dropping sales figures particular products have
disappeared from the shelves. People, who have clearly stopped buying the
product then get outraged that the coloured sugar product that the once enjoyed
as a child but have not purchased in years will not be available for them to
not buy in the years ahead.
Bowing to the power of the internet; a dark hole created by
people sitting in dark holes complaining about things other people are doing whilst
not actually doing anything themselves and specifically not buying Allen’s
lollies. Allen’s are bringing back Jelly Tots.
There are two styles of Jelly Tots, regular and Tangy. Tangy
appear to be the more traditional style with additional sugar added to the
outside of the jelly ball. You can never have enough sugar.
With sugar now being a major social faux pas and nutritional
no-no. Once promoted by the medical professions
as a dietary bonus to combat weight gain it is now seen as a major
contributor to obesity.
Despite this, the social demand for more sugar options has
won the day.
In the same vein I want to start a campaign to bring back
the “Big Boss”. The caramel candy cigar was readily available in corner delis
and school canteens in the ‘70s and ’80s. They were much more sophisticated
than their smaller cousin “Fags”, the lolly cigarette.
Big Bosses demanded attention, and gave the consumer an air
of gravitas even if consumed whilst wearing swimwear and flip-flops while
playing on the swings of a caravan park playground
Fags, suffered the indignity of having their name changed to
“Fads” in an act of political correctness. I am unsure what the perceived risk
of continuing to call them Fags. Were people concerned that children who consumed them would turn gay, or
that it would encourage gay children to smoke, or turn all smokers gay. Either way, the lolly cigarette was never
competition for their caramel cousin.
Both cigarette and cigar lollies originally had red coloured
sugar on one end to replicate the burning end of the tobacco product. These
were removed from both products years before they started to disappear
altogether from the shelves.
Polly Waffles, another Nestle product, should also be
reintroduced to the shelves. The
combination of wafer, marshmallow and chocolate were as light and delicious as
the shape of the chocolate bar was hilarious. In the same way that Big Bosses
and Fags did not really encourage smoking or homosexuality, Polly Waffles did
not promote people pooing in the pool.
No comments:
Post a Comment